Zombie Facts
Case file · reviewed Nov 5, 2026

Reviewed: “SCIgen” cites a retracted paper, and here that's fine

The paper was subsequently removed when the publishers were informed that it was a joke paper.[source retracted]

Wikipedia · SCIgen › In journals · 736 views in the last 30 days

We read the article and the retraction notice and decided no change is needed. The reason is in the case log below.

The source

Cooperative, compact algorithms for randomized algorithms

Rohollah Mosallahnezhad
Applied Mathematics and Computation · published March 2007 · cited 1 times by other papers

Retracted Apr 1, 2007

Date of Article and/or Notice UnknownNotice - Limited or No InformationRemoved

Where Wikipedia cites it

  1. SCIgen736 views a month
    Reviewed · no fix needed
  2. SCIgenalready warns readers
    Flagged

Case log

  1. FoundFound on SCIgen: the citation is live and nothing near it mentions the retraction.
  2. ReviewedRead by hand (SCIgen). The article cites the paper to explain that it was removed as a joke paper. That is the right use.

A zombie is not an accusation. Some articles cite a retracted paper to discuss it, and some retractions don't touch the cited claim, which is why a person reads every case. How we decide · How to contest a case

All cases on the correction desk →